Back to Gap Map Organization

Agenta AI

company · Germany

Scores

1 product on the map — 1 open.

Agenta

Openness

4 high confidence
4.0
license
MIT(OSI, core)
source
public
commercial
Agenta-Cloud-managed-tier(free tier available)
core features withheld
yes — the root LICENSE carves every ee/ directory out of MIT and under ee/LICENSE, the Agenta Enterprise License, which permits production use only with a valid Agenta Enterprise License

MIT covers the repository outside its ee/ directories, all of which can be self-hosted and run, but api/ee, web/ee and services/ee ship real source, Docker configs and tests under the separate Agenta Enterprise License, which requires a paid subscription for production use. That carve-out of working code under a commercial license, not just a hosted extra, keeps Agenta at open core rather than fully open source.

Adoption

2 high confidence
2.0

Adoption is measured by PyPI downloads of the agenta package, corroborated by GitHub stars on the same repository. Both signals place Agenta at an early, pre-mainstream stage of adoption.

Capability

3 medium confidence
3.0

Agenta covers the workspace basics for building and running agents but has dropped the evaluator catalogue, prompt management and observability-standard support it once offered. That leaves it two tiers below OpenHands, the category's broadest platform, with no published benchmark to place it more precisely.

  • https://agenta.ai/docs/ recorded 2026-09-29

    The docs page states "Agenta is a workspace where you and your team build agents and automations." and lists "Tracing and usage." and "Background agents." with no evaluator or prompt management section (searched: evaluat, prompt: none).

  • https://github.com/Agenta-AI/agenta recorded 2026-08-14

    repo tagline and README now read "Agenta is a workspace where you and your team build agents and automations" and "The open-source workspace for building and running agents". The README no longer mentions prompt management, evaluators or LLM observability.