AI Potluck
Model components / Benchmark / eval datasets

MT-Bench

SGLang (LMSYS / UC Berkeley)

Multi-turn open-ended benchmark of 80 questions for instruction-following and conversational ability, scored by a strong model acting as judge. Created by LMSYS, it ships inside FastChat with both the questions and GPT-4 reference answers published, and was introduced in the NeurIPS 2023 paper on judging with language models.

Small and partly saturated; a companion human-judgment dataset accompanies it. Verified 2026-08-12 via the FastChat llm_judge README, the FastChat LICENSE and the paper.

Openness

5 high confidence
5.0
questions
public(question.jsonl in the public FastChat git tree)
answers
public(GPT-4 references in FastChat)
license
Apache-2.0(FastChat repository LICENSE)
datasheet
present(fastchat/llm_judge/README.md documents the data, the judging protocol and the released judgment sets
arXiv
2306.05685 documents composition)
access
ungated(questions and reference answers sit in the public git tree, no download barrier)

Both questions and reference answers are public and openly licensed. MT-Bench ships inside FastChat rather than as a standalone dataset repo, so its documentation is the llm_judge package README and the LLM-as-a-Judge paper rather than a Hugging Face card, and its access state is a public git tree rather than a Hub download.

Adoption

2 medium confidence
2.0

2,361 downloads in the trailing 30 days for lmsys/mt_bench_human_judgments, which puts it in the 1K-10K band, level 2 on the dataset adoption scale. That scale tops out at >1M. The band is read off that package rather than off FastChat's 39.5k GitHub stars, which are shared across the whole platform: the dataset is the artifact being measured, and where a real download signal exists it governs over a star count.

Capability

4 medium confidence
4.0

The seminal multi-turn chat benchmark, and the one that pioneered LLM-as-judge scoring, though it is now small and partly saturated next to harder peers.

  • https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.05685 recorded 2026-08-13

    "Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arena"; the abstract still reads "we verify the agreement between LLM judges and human preferences by introducing two benchmarks - MT-bench, a multi-turn question set; and Chatbot Arena, a crowdsourced battle platform", with GPT-4 judges reaching over 80% agreement with humans

Verified 2026-08-12